That also seems to mean it hasn't got enough commercial potential to get the full attention of the right people. As is usual for 'Participant' films, this film wants you to think for yourself and avoids 'blood boiling'.

The film's (non)distribution is awful don't take it as indicative of the quality. All the different sorts of scams that even that one individual was connected with can be a bit unwieldy (quick, how are garment sweatshops, Indian casinos, and a fleet of gambling ships related to each other?). Using the Jack Abramoff scandal as the framework to do that is inspired, but still barely enough. politics into a single coherent short story. The film's main challenge is to circumscribe the large and somewhat ill-defined subject of money's influence on U.S. The film is not particularly 'slanted' or 'one-sided' (although it's fairly easy to figure out where the filmmakers sympathies lie), and doesn't try hard to 'demonize' any individual (although some subjects do a pretty good job of demonizing themselves).

For example, many scenes that could be nothing more than dry transcript reading are in fact voiced by an actor over an image of a moving reel tape player as well as the printed materials. It's firmly in the form of a 'documentary', but with a much larger team and budget and higher production values than that category label might at first lead you to expect. 'Casino Jack' is about the Jack Abramoff lobbying/influence-peddling/fraud scandal.

Casino jack movie streaming